<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marcos nahr, falando sobre design &#187; information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/tag/information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br</link>
	<description>falando sobre design, tecnologia e o mundo web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Annoying Web</title>
		<link>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/annoying-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/annoying-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Nähr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artigos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrusive Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 65 Most Annoying things about the Web. by Bradley Hebdon. We’ve come a long way on the web today. Or have we?  While we’ve innovated in many areas, we’ve also continued to disregard pre-existing issues. And in some cases, we have also created new ones. Here is my list of the top 65 most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4>The 65 Most Annoying things about the Web.</h4>
<p>by <a title="by Bradley Hebdon" href="http://www.uxbydesign.org/author/admin/">Bradley Hebdon</a>.</p>
<p>We’ve come a long way on the web today. Or have we?  While we’ve innovated in  many areas, we’ve also continued to disregard pre-existing issues. And in some  cases, we have also created new ones. Here is my list of the top 65 most  annoying things about the web today. They’re in no particular order, but I have  organized them into what I consider core groups.</p>

		<div class='et_quote'>
			<div class='et_right_quote'>
				<strong>Using the Web can still be a very annoying  experience!</strong>
			</div>
		</div>
	
<h3>Poor Design</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Illegible text.</strong> I can’t read that, it’s too small. And what  on earth is that font called?</li>
<li><strong>Busy backgrounds</strong>.  Oh MySpace, why do you allow users to  create profiles like that? My eyes hurt.</li>
<li><strong>Obscure links.</strong> I’m confused, can I click on that or not? Oh  I get it, you don’t want me to view other pages.</li>
<li><strong>Flyouts that are too large</strong>. Holy crap Yahoo!  This is a  page within a flyout!</li>
<li><strong>Drop-down menu navigation too many levels deep.</strong> OK, if I  slowly move my mouse this way first… dammit Jim, I’m a doctor not a magician!</li>
<li><strong>Complicated navigation</strong>. I just want to get to that page,  the one over there! Oh I see, you want me to complete the maze first.</li>
<li><strong>Abused centerpieces.</strong> Aren’t centerpieces supposed to serve  as mechanisms for promotion, rather than areas to cram an entire page’s worth of  content into itself? Call me an idealist, I guess.</li>
<li><strong>Poor navigation labels.</strong> Give me a clue and use labels that  make sense!</li>
<li><strong>Clutter &amp; chaos</strong>. With no emphasis or information  hierarchy, it’s difficult for me to know what to look at, and what to do next.</li>
<li><strong>Ugly WAPs.</strong> Many companies treat their WAP sites like a  deformed step-child they keep in the basement.</li>
<li><strong>Splash screens.</strong> Nice, a road block between your user and  your home page.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Unfindable Information</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Dysfunctional site search</strong>. (Sigh) Why didn’t this site just  use Google?</li>
<li><strong>Too many blog categories</strong>. Isn’t this what tags were  meant for?</li>
<li><strong>Contact info.</strong> I just want to speak to them on the phone!  And when I say “them” i mean a human.</li>
<li><strong>Invisible sign in.</strong> OK, so I registered, but how do I sign  in?</li>
<li><strong>Hidden account closure.</strong> I guess I’m a member for life now?</li>
<li><strong>Unscannable info. </strong>I want to quickly know if this article is  relevant. But alas, huge paragraphs, long headlines and no subheadings make for  an unscannable chunk of data, and an indigestible piece of gristle.</li>
</ol>
<h3>No Content Strategy</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>No focus.</strong> Yada, yada, yada. Get to the point, what’s your  message and what do you offer?</li>
<li><strong>Spelling &amp; grammar.</strong> Spelling mistakes are hard to  forgive and really hurt credibility.</li>
<li><strong>Ineffective product pages:</strong> What am I buying? Why should I  buy this? Help me understand, and I’ll move down the purchase funnel!</li>
<li><strong>Outdated. </strong>There’s nothing more thrilling than seeing a blog  frozen in time. At some point, a landfill for websites is going to be needed.</li>
<li><strong>Small photos</strong>. Why would I buy something I cannot see?</li>
</ol>
<h3>Auto-Behavior</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Auto-playing home page video</strong>. Take note ESPN.com: the first  thing I do when coming to your site is scramble to find the video pause button.  And that’s when I’m surfing from home.</li>
<li><strong>Auto browser resizing.</strong> And you did that because?</li>
<li><strong>Customer service nags</strong>. Ironic really. Chat pop-ups appear  like genies out of a lamp when I don’t need them.</li>
<li><strong>Theme tunes.</strong> Got to love that auto-play music, especially  when it cycles over and over and over, and over.</li>
<li><strong>Auto opt-ins</strong>. It seems like an automatic opt-in is a  contradiction in terms to me. No I don’t want your newsletter, and if I did, I’d  opt-in.<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Evil Forms</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Unreadable captchas.</strong> Pure Evil. If I had a brick, why I  would…</li>
<li><strong>Too many fields.</strong> This is utterly exhausting. Oh forget it,  I’m going to abandon this form.</li>
<li><strong>Cryptic error messaging.</strong> OK, so I made a mistake. If you  used English, I might be able to fix it.</li>
<li><strong>No confirmation</strong>. Was I successful or not? I’m looking for  anything here, a “thank-you”, a “job well done”, a “good boy”… anything that  confirms the form was indeed a submitted form.</li>
<li><strong>Too many constraints. </strong>I want to add my Canadian zip code,  but you’re validating against the US format only!</li>
<li><strong>Too small fields</strong>. How I’m supposed to enter my street  address in that state-sized field?</li>
<li><strong>The reset button. </strong>Do we really need this? I especially love  it when I accidentally press “reset” instead of “submit”. It’s especially  satisfying when it’s a long form.<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Intrusive Advertising</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Pop-ups.</strong> And that includes those fancy, flashy, moving,  hard-to-close ones. Are you serious? This is 2009.</li>
<li><strong>Interstitials.</strong> Thanks for adding another click and creating  a barrier between me and your content! Give me a reason to leave, I dare you.</li>
<li><strong>Flyouts via links in content</strong>. Oh darn, I didn’t know that  was an ad! Thanks for punishing me.</li>
<li><strong>Too many Google ads.</strong> I know there’s some content around  here….</li>
<li><strong>Long video pre-rolls.</strong> Is this ad ever going to end? Hang  on; I forgot what video I clicked on.</li>
<li><strong>The bus stop</strong>. Home pages that resemble bus stops — flyers,  posters, graffiti all shouting at me. Sometimes, I swear I can even smell  urine.<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Accounts</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Remembering user names and passwords.</strong> Seriously, how many  do I need to keep track of? Just give me Facebook connect already!</li>
<li><strong>Being forced to register for purchases</strong>. I just want to buy  it, OK? Forget it, I’m going elsewhere.</li>
<li><strong>Forced password reset.</strong> I just want to know my password! The  one I chose but have forgotten. I know you know.</li>
<li><strong>Getting locked out.</strong> I get the three-attempts-and-you’re-out  idea, but it would be nice to know the rules before hand!</li>
<li><strong>Password sent by “snail mail”</strong>. I’m not sure whether to  laugh or cry. Should I expect a scroll to be delivered and read by a  messenger?<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Abuse</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Spam.</strong> We still cannot cure this disease?</li>
<li><strong>Viruses. </strong>If I was a conspiracy theorist, I’d say the  anti-virus companies were creating these. You know, supply and demand and all.</li>
<li><strong>Phishing. </strong>Particularly sneaky; and definitely a step beyond  annoying.</li>
<li><strong>Trolls on messageboards/blogs.</strong> Oh well, that’s life I guess  – art imitating life and all.</li>
<li><strong>Fake profiles.</strong> Am I following the real Steven Hawking on  Twitter? It says here he went bowling last night.</li>
<li><strong>Facebook app invitations.</strong> For the thousandth time, no I do  not want to play Mob Wars, and no I don’t want a “pet in an egg” either.<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Technology</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Explorer 6.</strong> I speak for all developers here, if there’s a  plug attached, please pull it. RIP Explorer 6.</li>
<li><strong>Plug-ins.</strong> Not only do I have to download another plug-in, I  have to keep these things current!</li>
<li><strong>Entire sites built in flash.</strong> I don’t get it, why?</li>
<li><strong>PDF overuse.</strong> Why couldn’t this PDF just be a web page?</li>
<li><strong>Dell’s Netbook trackpad</strong>. Designed to be web browsing  device, Dell’s Mini 10 trackpad has a trillion bells and whistles, but cannot  fulfill basic tasks like moving the cursor from point A to point B without going  to C first.</li>
<li><strong>Small netbook screens</strong>. While mobile devices have optimized  views for their screens, Netbooks and their 9 and 10 inch screens are caught in  a weird place.</li>
<li><strong>Inconsistent colors. </strong>Optimizing colors and contrast across  both Macs and PCs is a designers nightmare.</li>
<li><strong>Charging for Wi-Fi.</strong> Provide it free of charge, and the  patrons will come!<strong> </strong></li>
</ol>
<h3>Waiting</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Slow page load</strong>. OK that’s it, I’ve been patient and their 3  seconds are up.</li>
<li><strong>Comment approval.</strong> I thought, I articulated, I commented, I  waited. Nothing.  That will teach me to contribute.</li>
<li><strong>Black-hole between ordering and shipping</strong>. I took me 5  minutes to order this laptop, why isn’t it getting shipped? Should I place my  order again? Should I cancel this order? What’s the order status?</li>
<li><strong>Twitter is down again</strong>. I’m starting to think this is a  feature. One akin to a long line outside a trendy night club.</li>
<li><strong>Customer service. </strong>Since I cannot get a human on the phone,  a 24 hour response time to my e-mail is not acceptable. Well look at that, I  guess you just quantified the value of my business.</li>
<li><strong>Submission timers. </strong>I saw this really great article! I know,  I’ll post it on Reddit. And there’s another one, I’ll post that on Reddit too.  What, I have to wait 10 minutes to post another article? That will  teach me to  contribute.</li>
</ol>
<p><code><br />
<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
amazon_ad_tag = "pensandodesig-20"; amazon_ad_width = "468"; amazon_ad_height = "60"; amazon_ad_logo = "hide"; amazon_ad_link_target = "new"; amazon_ad_price = "retail"; amazon_ad_border = "hide"; amazon_ad_discount = "remove"; amazon_color_border = "FFFFFF";
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/s/ads.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
</code></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Annoying+Web+http%3A%2F%2Fmarcosnahr.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D970" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Annoying+Web+http%3A%2F%2Fmarcosnahr.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D970" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/annoying-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design: too much information</title>
		<link>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/design-to-ponder-over-vs-too-much-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/design-to-ponder-over-vs-too-much-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Nähr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web designer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/design-to-ponder-over-vs-too-much-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most sites oppress and confound, fragmenting and breaking off information. “I suspect, however, that (Funes) was not exactly versed in thinking. Thinking means forgetting differences, generalizing, abstracting.” (Funes, o Memorioso, Ficções, Jorge Luis Borges). “In order to think, we inevitably need to generalize, and in doing so, we must forget” A short while ago, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Most sites oppress and confound, fragmenting and breaking off information.</h3>
<p>“I suspect, however, that (Funes) was not exactly versed in thinking. Thinking means forgetting differences, generalizing, abstracting.” (Funes, o Memorioso, Ficções, Jorge Luis Borges).</p>
<blockquote><p>“In order to think, we inevitably need to generalize, and in doing so, we must forget”</p></blockquote>
<p>A short while ago, I was reading a book about memory when I came across a note on the short story Funes, O Memorioso, by Jorge Luis Borges.</p>
<p>In the short story above, Borges describes a character, Irineu Funes who, from a certain point in his life on, develops perfect memory, that is, he is able to recall absolutely everything. He manages to grasp the particulars of everything he lives, capable to remember a whole day of his life in minute detail, to the last second, even if it took him another whole day to do so.</p>
<p>However, what most impressed me about Funes was not his astonishing memory skills, but his “inability to forget”.</p>
<p>“In order to think, we inevitably need to generalize, and in doing so, we must forget”. (A Memória de Borges, Virgílio Fernandes Almeida).</p>
<p>Transporting this account into the universe of design, we realize that the Internet is becoming increasingly similar to Funes. The number of details and the overabundance of information in today’s sites smother users. Most current sites oppress and confound, fragmenting and breaking off information.</p>
<p>“Nevertheless, I suspect that (Funes) was not capable of thinking… In Funes’ overloaded world there was nothing but details…” (Funes, o Memorioso, Ficções, Jorge Luis Borges).</p>
<p>Web designers must realize they do not have to “show users everything”, overloading them with information and details, for the latter are no sooner perceived than they are forgotten.</p>
<p>“… (men) end up hauling, everywhere, a formidable amount of insufferable pebbles of knowledge, which now and then still rumble in the stomach…” (Considerações Extemporâneas, Nietzsche</p>
<p>Men’s memory is innately selective. Human beings possess an amazing ability to see the world which is radically opposed to that of Funes’. We are even able to look somewhere and see what is not there.</p>
<p>Nothing comes closer to human thought than hyperlinks. Through them, contrary to Funes’ cumulative system, we but connect, traverse, slide, and navigate.</p>
<p>Web design must be given a boost in order to be potentially creative, enveloped in a veil of mystery, vitality, strength, necessary illusion, blindness, bias.</p>
<p><strong>Web design must go back to making users think! </strong></p>
<p><code></p>
<p></code></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Design%3A+too+much+information+http%3A%2F%2Fmarcosnahr.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D48" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Design%3A+too+much+information+http%3A%2F%2Fmarcosnahr.com.br%2F%3Fp%3D48" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marcosnahr.com.br/design-to-ponder-over-vs-too-much-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

